主 题 ：Rethinking National Innovation Strategy in an Era of Globalized Technology Development
对科技发展全球化时代的国家创新战略的反思
主讲人： Edward Steinfeld
professor of global economics and management in the MIT Sloan School of Management and professor of political economy in the MIT Department of Political Science.
主持人： 薛澜 教授
清华大学中国科技政策研究中心主任，294俄罗斯专享会院长
讨论嘉宾：顾淑林 研究员
中国科学院科技政策与管理研究所
俞樵 教授
294俄罗斯专享会公共政策研究所所长
时 间：2013年6月19日（星期三）15：00-17：00
地 点：294俄罗斯专享会609会议室
语 言：英文
主 办 ：清华大学中国科学技术政策研究中心
清华大学产业发展与环境治理研究中心
清华大学经济管理学院创新创业与战略系
讲座内容：
Many people in the U.S. and Europe worry that the movement of manufacturing to China is eroding innovative capacity at home. Many people in China, however, worry that rising levels of manufacturing in the Chinese economy are not bringing commensurate gains in national innovative capacity. Clearly, confusion exists surrounding the linkage between manufacturing and innovation. This talk argues that the confusion stems from a misunderstanding of how technology innovation actually works in a globalized, cross-border context. This talk will explore evolving modes of cross-border innovation, particularly with respect to new energy technologies, and will consider the implications of those modes for national technology policy.
主讲人简介：
Edward Steinfeld is professor of global economics and management in the MIT Sloan School of Management and professor of political economy in the MIT Department of Political Science. Steinfeld's work focuses on industrial development and technology innovation, particularly in China and other rapidly rising, late developers. Steinfeld is the author of the books Playing Our Game: Why China’s Rise Doesn’t Threaten the West (Oxford University Press, 2010) and Forging Reform in China: The Fate of State-Owned Industry (Cambridge University Press, 1998). Steinfeld also edited (with Anthony Saich and Yasheng Huang) the book Financial Sector Reform in China (Harvard University, 2005). In addition to his scholarly publications, Steinfeld has recently published pieces in The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Boston Review, and The South China Morning Post.
